Miscellanea
Me: Hi Work
Work: Hey, we've got an idea we'd like to run by you...
Me: Oh sure, what did you have in mind?"
Work: Well, how would you like to go home a nurse your blog?
Me: Well, I had planned on actually working and earning cash.
Work: Well, that might be a
challenge...
Work decided to send me home today. They sent me home because of a failure to communicate. The failure being wholly on their part (for two work days in a row). Guess it's a good thing love's free. In addition to being free, it's good that those that love me are employed and can support my stupid ass.
But alas, I'm not bitching. Not today, anyhow. I might around paycheck time. But that's then. Today we'll just shake the Pink Avenger's
tree and see what shakes loose. I've been slow on the uptake to blog this last couple of weeks. My reasons being that I just didn't really have the volition. Lots of interesting shit going on, still. The Red Heat Saga continues to sizzle. Mostly with Russia politely saying, "Shut up, I'm boss.."
Mainstream finacial news seems to be a cacophany of impulsive waves of frolic brought on by the Fed sump-pumping credit into the economy, followed by the corrective waves of investors getting ansty in the face of fundamentals pointing towards the ever-looming contraction. Technical and Fundamental realities seem to be pulling more and more in opposite directions without any traction to show for it. I'm not going to feign the necessary familiarity with financial news trends to say this signifies a sea-change, but I still get the feeling that the back-and-forth good news/bad news could spell some critical mass being reached in monetary elasticity.
Still, it must never be forgotten that new wealth is constantly being created, and this is what banks are issuing new money/bank credit against. Remember however, this new wealth is not synonymous with the commodity of bank credit/paper money, just as actual cost is not synonymous with price. The problem is that this new wealth reveals itself only in an after-the-fact/a posteori fashion, and that central banks are issuing loans, against this collateral of potential wealth, without any concrete calculation of how much new wealth is being generated.
But while we cannot calculate ahead of time how much wealth is being created, we can infer from past performance that this amount averages somewhere within 2 degrees of standard deviation (roughly 4.5%), to borrow from statistical terms. I imagine because most growth rates falls within this null-hypothesis netherworld, that Keynsian calculation primarily fails. There are periods when new wealth being brought into an economy exceeds this amount, such as currently in China, but these are the exception, not the rule, in fiat-money economies. Also remember China is on the long-end of the stick in its trade imbalance with America.
So what does all this have to the financial melt-down oft foreseen in popular finacial literature? Well, it means that basically while we can know the apriori realities of economics with certainty, we cannot know know when they'll kick in without having numbers and stats that can only be known after-the-fact.